Lee Edelman discusses his new book, queer theory, future of education with Jess Keiser
Lee Edelman discussed his new book “Bad Education: Why Queer Theory Teaches Us Nothing,” with fellow Tufts English professor Jess Keiser on March 9 at an English department event. Edelman, the Fletcher professor of English literature at Tufts, and Keiser unpacked the book’s key theses and its relevance in today’s context.
“This book … was started many years ago, long before the contemporary culture wars around education,” Edelman said. “Whole areas of academic expertise and conceptualization are being tabooed by government intervention. … The fate of the humanities is being decided, but not only the humanities; because … the humanities really are in this case, the canary in the mine. The humanities will be the first to go but what’s really under attack is education itself.”
Edelman refers to ‘bad education’ in two ways: one in a rebellious, counternormative sense, as “an education that is focused on the possibility of interrogating rather than producing step-by-step blueprints about how to produce something that will make more money,” and another as one which is designed to transmute basic values and knowledge to students.
“The [premise] of the book is that all of the institutions of education are organized to generate a positive product,” Edelman said. “That product can simply be identified as meaning, values, understanding, knowledge [or] something that is transportable and measurable.”
Edelman argues that certain identities, such as queerness, Blackness and womanhood, are relegated to a space without meaning in society — he says that society tries to materialize these groups with language so that it may marginalize and exclude them.
An education of poor quality, Edelman says, is one that tries — and fails — to prescribe meaning to terms like ‘queerness’ which represent, as Edelman suggests, an “attempt to materialize what is in itself conceptualized as outside of or other than being.”
“You can’t exclude non-being simply by calling it ‘non-being,’” Edelman argued. “You find a figural substitution for non-being … then that figure of non-being can be cast out of the social order, as if thereby you were purging the social order of the non-being that is inherent to that social order itself. This is the logic that ‘Bad Education’ follows.”
Following his introduction, Keiser asked Edelman about psychoanalysis and its reputation among students and professors.
“Freud, psychoanalysis, queer theory, critical race theory; all of them are … [cast aside] because they are interpretive sciences,” Edelman responded. “The neoliberal university … wants to turn [students] into ChatGPT: regurgitating what is known, making the same material available over and over again, but prohibiting or restricting the possibility of placing any value in the analysis or interpretation of events. … Psychoanalysis is the art of interpreting what refuses interpretation.”
Keiser then asked Edelman about his book’s critique of both liberal and conservative identity politics.
“The right knows that society is divided, and it plays on divisions within society,” Edelman said. “The discourse of the left is the discourse of inclusion, and it’s the discourse of overcoming division, … [but] it doesn’t overcome division. Its very goal of inclusion necessarily excludes those who are in favor of exclusion.”
Edelman argued that, to imagine a liberal utopia in which everyone agrees is to imagine a world without dissent, or as he put it, “a fatal necropolis where thinking has ceased.”
Keiser asked Edelman how he would respond to a reading of “Bad Education” which equivocates identities Edelman sees as marginalized.
“Every designation of an excluded, delegitimized population will have its unique history, and it will have its unique social circumstances that will affect how the experience of those persons unfolds,” Edelman said. “But that’s different from saying that those populations don’t share the experience of a form of exclusion.”
A key paradox “Bad Education” explores is the impossibility of trying to describe something that does not exist. Keiser asked whether examples of “nothing” can be translated into a literal figure for purposes of critical discussion. Edelman suggested art as a medium for confronting “the space of the nothing.”
“We’re accustomed to thinking that art requires us to unpack something. … We think that life is literal, and it never is,” he said. “There is no literal world; there are only worlds created through language, just as there are only queers or Blacks created through language. [As] James Baldwin said, color is not a human or a personal reality, it’s a political reality.”
Latest Tufts Daily
- Video: Inside Gifford House with University President Anthony MonacoDoes the president of Tufts really live at the president’s residence? Are there koi fish in the Gifford House garage? Will squirrely eat his nut? The Daily discovers answers to these questions and more on a tour of Gifford House with outgoing University President Anthony Monaco. Video by Julia Carpi and Carl Svahn / The […]
- Video: Tufts professors react to their Rate My Professor reviewsEver wonder what your professors really think of their Rate My Professor ratings? Tufts professors joined video journalists Chloe Nacson-Schechter and Margaux Wade to read and react to some of their Rate My Professor reviews. Special thanks to all the featured professors. Video by Chloe Nacson-Schechter and Margaux Wade / The Tufts Daily
- Video: Empower Hour fosters welcoming workout environmentThe Tufts Community Union Senate launched Empower Hour as a pilot program in the spring 2023 semester. Empower Hour aimed to create a safe space for female-identifying and nonbinary students to build confidence in the gym. Video journalists Nora Palkon and Sophi Schneider spoke to coaches and students about what the weekly program meant to […]
- Weekly Newsletter: May 21, 2023 (Commencement)Congratulations, Class of 2023: Commencement Issue
- Q&A: Monaco sits for final annual interview with the Daily, reflects on accomplishments, hopes for the future of TuftsAs his 12-year tenure as president of Tufts University comes to a close, Anthony Monaco sat down with the Daily to discuss his legacy, accomplishments and hopes for the university’s future. Editor’s note: This interview has been edited for length and clarity. The Tufts Daily (TD): President Monaco, thank you so much. We’re so honored […]
- Senior Profile: TCU President Jaden Pena fosters understanding and inclusion through his leadership“The best compliment that I’ve ever received was from one of my high school musical directors,” Jaden Pena said. “He told me that what he loved most about me was my ability to bridge different communities. And I think that was really an awakening moment for me.” Indeed, Pena’s time at Tufts has been marked […]